Gregory L. Poe Feb 6th, 2010What is the Purpose of Restitution in a Federal Criminal Case?
A recent Tenth Circuit case, United States v. Speakman, No. 08-1332 (Feb. 2, 2010), presents an interesting question in federal criminal practice: May a district court order a defendant to pay restitution for the purpose of punishment even if the payment does not compensate the victim? According to the Tenth Circuit, the answer is no. [...]
Gregory L. Poe Sep 25th, 2009Venue, Prejudice, and Science in Criminal Trials
Any time a federal court of appeals states that a district court is not required to consider evidence, without any qualifying statement concerning the reliability of that evidence, one tends to take notice. Earlier this week, the Eighth Circuit held (in a case involving grisly and heartbreaking facts) that a district court is not required even [...]
Gregory L. Poe Sep 5th, 2009Conrad Black and Special Verdicts
The Conrad Black case, now in the Supreme Court, has received a great deal of recent attention largely because the Court has agreed to revisit the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (which states that “the term ‘scheme or artifice to defraud’” as used in the mail and wire fraud statutes “includes a scheme or [...]
Gregory L. Poe Aug 1st, 2009The Rule of Lenity
I considered various topics for my initial blog post and settled on the rule of lenity. The spirit of the rule of lenity – fundamental fairness – lies at the heart of a respectable criminal justice system. See McBoyle v. United States, 283 U.S. 25, 27 (1931) (the principle of “fair warning” motivates the lenity rule) [...]
